RE: Death Penalty
July 23, 2014 at 10:39 pm
(This post was last modified: July 23, 2014 at 10:40 pm by Dystopia.)
True story, and justice based on revenge is not justice, even though pro death penalty activists see it as such (wrongly!).
I find some hope in this image:
![[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQHBV6cBBS7Yv4IZw8oIv4...O7FPTfijrb]](https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQHBV6cBBS7Yv4IZw8oIv4eIn304CuokiR8NMKVo0O7FPTfijrb)
But defending the death penalty because of a thirst for blood is called an appeal to emotions fallacy. There's a reason why the victims/relatives don't have a right to dictate the sentence and courts are impartial. Why do you think that is?
I find some hope in this image:
(July 23, 2014 at 10:38 pm)Chad32 Wrote: Few people can remain calm and collected in times like these, so I don't blame anyone for wanting to make someone suffer as they were made too. Whether it's right or not is debatable, but there's a reason why anger is a listed stage of the grieving process.
But defending the death penalty because of a thirst for blood is called an appeal to emotions fallacy. There's a reason why the victims/relatives don't have a right to dictate the sentence and courts are impartial. Why do you think that is?

Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you