Vatican Embassy Protestor

[Purplundy]

*Cough* Galileo *Cough*

*Cough* Everything to do with the Virgin Mary *Cough*

*Cough* Implausibility of the Resurrection *Cough*

I could go on...

Geocentrism was never an official doctrine of the Catholic Church. It was just an opinion that it held for a time. Never in that time period did it wield its infallibility.
And, if the Catholic Church professes that a supernatural being exists, why would virgin birth and resurrection be off limits to it?

---

Matthew 10:34-35

34 "Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword."
35 "For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law."

Luke 12:51-52

51 "Do you suppose that I came to grant peace on earth? I tell you, no, but rather division."
52 "For from now on five members in one household will be divided, three against two and two against three"

Sounds like a fallible human being said these things.

Is there something morally wrong with being a controversial figure? Like Martin Luther King?
Don't atheism and homosexuality set family members against one another?

---

The Pope's selection of Cardinals is covered by Papal infallibility otherwise the Cardinals couldn't be empowered to select the Pope.

So you've noted that your 'evidence' contains no mention of infallibility.
The pope is selected by a vote. That's it. Perfectly fallible.
The pope is infallible because he is the pope. No matter who he is. There is not a breed of infallible white male Italians that the cardinals need to discover.

Like when the articles of faith regarding unbaptised babies & Limbo were retracted.

Interesting. Can you back that up with a link or a quote or something?