(August 1, 2014 at 1:03 am)MPCADF Wrote: I am glad none of us can find a naturalistic explanation to account for the eyewitness testimony of the Apostles.
Huh, changing the topic. Are you giving up on your debunked cosmological argument, now?
The explanation is that it didn't happen. If it did, I'd expect to see even more eyewitness testimony from all of "the multitudes" who allegedly witnessed said events. Instead, all we have are a bunch of books written several decades after Jesus' death by a bunch of apologists with an agenda. When someone makes a claim that involves walking on water, transmutation, and resurrection, I'm going to be skeptical. When those claims aren't corroborated by outside sources, and the claims contradict each other, I'm calling bullshit.
The burden of proof is on you.
(August 1, 2014 at 1:03 am)MPCADF Wrote: The lawyer in the Guinness World Records who won 400 cases in a row said the best evidential case he has ever seen was for the life, death, burial, resurrection and deity of Jesus. So in terms of evidence, God has provided the best proof we could ever reasonably ask for.
In fact, you nor I can even come up with better evidence for Jesus being God. That's powerful.
What evidence do you have for the resurrection? You have four contradictory claims. They could have all been explained also by either:
1) the body being stolen, or
2) the story being fabricated.
Given that your option involves unsubstantiated magic, I don't see any reason to assume it's true.
