RE: Vaccines are a plot by big pharma!
August 3, 2014 at 9:21 am
(This post was last modified: August 3, 2014 at 2:02 pm by Fidel_Castronaut.)
There Is absolutely nothing wrong with MMR.
Fact - it's 100% safe regarding autism proven beyond all reasonable doubt through multiple studies over successive decades.
Fact - the MMR 'controversy' was invented by a fraud who was given backhanders to find an issue with MMR and conducted unethical, illegal experiments with unnessesary invasive treatments on minors.
Fact - it is cheaper than doing it separately and a LOT more efficient. You nail 3 vaccines in one. And what's cheaper for the government is cheaper for us as taxpayers.
There Is no reason to get them done separately unless you have extenuating circumstances (where on the NHS you can get them done). If it's cheaper and just as safe (if not more safer), then it would be illogical to do that any other way.
Fact - pharmaceutical companies get very, very little money from immunological research and the implementation of vaccination programmes relative to the majority of their other drug treatments. It's a one treatment paradigm. Pharma companies get most of their revenue from repeated treatment programmes such as anti-depressants et al. Where people require prolonged treatments (possible for their entire life) and where generics are much harder to create and much harder to market.
Id be interested to see what figures you've found for money generated by companies like GSK for sales of MMR relative to research input and cost of production.
Fact - it's 100% safe regarding autism proven beyond all reasonable doubt through multiple studies over successive decades.
Fact - the MMR 'controversy' was invented by a fraud who was given backhanders to find an issue with MMR and conducted unethical, illegal experiments with unnessesary invasive treatments on minors.
Fact - it is cheaper than doing it separately and a LOT more efficient. You nail 3 vaccines in one. And what's cheaper for the government is cheaper for us as taxpayers.
There Is no reason to get them done separately unless you have extenuating circumstances (where on the NHS you can get them done). If it's cheaper and just as safe (if not more safer), then it would be illogical to do that any other way.
Fact - pharmaceutical companies get very, very little money from immunological research and the implementation of vaccination programmes relative to the majority of their other drug treatments. It's a one treatment paradigm. Pharma companies get most of their revenue from repeated treatment programmes such as anti-depressants et al. Where people require prolonged treatments (possible for their entire life) and where generics are much harder to create and much harder to market.
Id be interested to see what figures you've found for money generated by companies like GSK for sales of MMR relative to research input and cost of production.