RE: Moral standards
August 4, 2014 at 5:28 am
(This post was last modified: August 4, 2014 at 5:33 am by GodsRevolt.)
(August 2, 2014 at 7:03 am)popeyespappy Wrote:(August 1, 2014 at 3:29 am)GodsRevolt Wrote: I think I am a bit leery of the the idea of "benefit" in morality.
I'm more than a bit leery about someone who's morality is dictated by an organization that teaches it is better to let a woman die of septicemia than to let a doctor cut the rotting piece of meat that was her fetus out of her just because it still has a heartbeat.
This is inaccurate.
(August 2, 2014 at 9:40 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: Not to me but to the backwards societies that cling to superstitious beliefs in higher beings and not in the golden rule..."don't be a dick"
If we followed the "don't be a dick" rule we could. To do this of course we would first have to discard all religious texts, they are all full of commandments that break the golden rule.
So, you agree that morals are not be relative. But then where did they come from?
". . . let the atheists themselves choose a god. They will find only one divinity who ever uttered their isolation; only one religion in which God seemed for an instant to be an atheist." -G. K. Chesterton