RE: The existence of ETs would mean...
August 14, 2014 at 8:56 pm
(This post was last modified: August 14, 2014 at 9:00 pm by CristW.)
(August 14, 2014 at 8:04 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Why are you putting all this goofy shit in the "philosophy" section? Put it in the "woo" section where it belongs, please. Philosophy is for logical arguments about how to approach thinking about things-- not the presentation of random trivia without sensible ideas to back it up.
"goofy"? There is nothing goofy about the info unless you are WORKING for them? Or simply ignoring the obvious. Anyone with sense (and I really mean this in a philosophical manner using epistemological knowledge) could make the connections unless you are one of the "Goofy" assholes who allowed Al-Qaeda to fly planes into buildings on 9/11, you better get off your arrogant ass and see the light.
I know that we both could be atheists but I do not have to like you! Since NAZIS are also atheists/agnostics in some manner therefore we could be atheists and hate each other. Definately not to respect each other! I do not care about what you think about me and it is my first Amendment right to post the info.
As for picking the philosophy section? it was appropriate. I have taken philosophy: intro, moral philosophy and critical thinking as well. There is no other section where ETs could especially associating with the afterlife and refuting "religion"(which is actually a failed philosophy).
John Hosper's Propositional knowledge method:
1. p must be true (objective requirement).
2. Not only p be true: We must be believe p is true (subjective requirement).
3. YOU MUST HAVE EVIDENCE for p.
4. Strong and weak sense of knowing p.
Ok, now tell me what is random about the vids or my posts???