RE: The existence of "Ghosts" means...
August 14, 2014 at 10:46 pm
(This post was last modified: August 14, 2014 at 11:00 pm by CristW.)
Sejanus,
1. I am fully aware that science deals WITH the OBSERVABLE(and TESTED) NATURAL world! Read Karl Popper's essay - The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Popper's essay has all the proof I need concerning this post(s) and our discussion. There are too many examples in his essay. This includes the 100% proof statement just in case it is not repeated further down. I suggest that you read his essay and then respond.
2. The Leprechaun thing was meant as a joke and when you introduced It I knew it was a joke. So, your further statements are just trying to find some flaw with me (grasping for straws).
3. Your logical flaw is PERSONAL INCREDULITY! Just because you do not understand my premise and conclusion it is not therefore false. This is further from the truth.
4. Again, a joke concerning (natural) "colon" cleansers when they are so so available on the market. So, if the shit comes from there what is the point of "colon" cleansers and then using Obamacare for it? It is usually full of shit, of course (Just returning the insult).
Read post #25. You want a logical argument with premise from post#25? It goes like this:
1. If there are "ghosts" from previous living human beings, then the world would be filled(infested) with ghosts.
2. Then why is the world not filled(or infested) with past ghosts?
3. There are no "ghosts"!
Points 1 and 2 are supporting premises to the conclusion in point #3.
Now, it may be the case that I would be combining the "ghost" evidence with ETs and this would lead to a logical argument called - Reductio ad Absurdum or Reduce to a Contradiction.
1. I am fully aware that science deals WITH the OBSERVABLE(and TESTED) NATURAL world! Read Karl Popper's essay - The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Popper's essay has all the proof I need concerning this post(s) and our discussion. There are too many examples in his essay. This includes the 100% proof statement just in case it is not repeated further down. I suggest that you read his essay and then respond.
2. The Leprechaun thing was meant as a joke and when you introduced It I knew it was a joke. So, your further statements are just trying to find some flaw with me (grasping for straws).
3. Your logical flaw is PERSONAL INCREDULITY! Just because you do not understand my premise and conclusion it is not therefore false. This is further from the truth.
4. Again, a joke concerning (natural) "colon" cleansers when they are so so available on the market. So, if the shit comes from there what is the point of "colon" cleansers and then using Obamacare for it? It is usually full of shit, of course (Just returning the insult).
(August 14, 2014 at 10:27 pm)ignoramus Wrote: Common judge, what's the fine!
1 week ban for blowing up our bullshit detector!
Read post #25. You want a logical argument with premise from post#25? It goes like this:
1. If there are "ghosts" from previous living human beings, then the world would be filled(infested) with ghosts.
2. Then why is the world not filled(or infested) with past ghosts?
3. There are no "ghosts"!
Points 1 and 2 are supporting premises to the conclusion in point #3.
Now, it may be the case that I would be combining the "ghost" evidence with ETs and this would lead to a logical argument called - Reductio ad Absurdum or Reduce to a Contradiction.
