(August 15, 2014 at 1:39 pm)CristW Wrote:(August 15, 2014 at 11:03 am)LostLocke Wrote: The first step in quoting sources is to verify them.
From http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2...-new-data/
“The problem is very simple,” said David Sandwell, a Scripps geophysicist who worked on the project, in an email to ABC News. “When you measure seafloor depth you actually measure the two-way travel time of a sonar echo. The ship sends it, it bounces off the bottom, and returns to the ship. To convert the time to depth you need a velocity. If the velocity used in the conversion is a bit too high, the depth from that cruise will be greater than all the surrounding cruises. The particular cruise that created the ‘Atlantis’ problem was a systematic mow-the-lawn type survey in a regular grid pattern, so the resulting depth errors looked like a regular grid.”
Thanks for the info, please go ahead and refute the NAZI UFO vids. I would love to see the data on this.
Here is the problem:
1. The Atlantis vid was supporting evidence to the main evidence.
2. Even the recent photo concerning the "atlantis" grid seems controversial or rather not a 100% refutation(because you could still see some semblance of unnatural formation)!
If you actually hold these views, you're my favorite poster of all time so far on AF. It's like talking to a star trek fan who thinks it's real.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
- Thomas Jefferson