I flirted with the idea of pantheism and I lean more in that direction, than atheism. It's totally backed by scientific logic. "A star died, so you can exist" is not disputable. Our physical world is made out of the same stuff and are bound by the same physics. There's really no controversy until the G-Bomb is dropped. Then the fugly can of stigma is cracked open.
Dawkins calls it sexed up atheism like it's a bad thing. In all fairness, nobody wants to see Dawkins all sexed up, so I don't blame him. What is the opposite of sexed up anyways? I'll just be polite and call it abstinent.
Carl Sagan seemed to lean towards pantheism, more than atheism. Einstein and Mark Twain also leaned in that direction.
Dawkins calls it sexed up atheism like it's a bad thing. In all fairness, nobody wants to see Dawkins all sexed up, so I don't blame him. What is the opposite of sexed up anyways? I'll just be polite and call it abstinent.
Carl Sagan seemed to lean towards pantheism, more than atheism. Einstein and Mark Twain also leaned in that direction.
god is supposed to be imaginary
