RE: Why the stigma with Pantheism?
August 25, 2014 at 1:18 am
(This post was last modified: August 25, 2014 at 1:20 am by Anomalocaris.)
(August 25, 2014 at 12:57 am)stonedape Wrote:(August 25, 2014 at 12:45 am)Rhythm Wrote: Yeah, it is, but one thing it's not - is pantheism. You're going to need better "scientific logic" round these parts.What about what is disputable? Don't we share common DNA with a blade of grass? Is there any evidence to the contrary about anything I said? I mean this sincerely.
The problem lies with the word "so". A star died because it died. Not so that you can live. You live because condition existed for you to live. Not because a star sacrificed itself to make the condition exist.
"So" implies intent and purpose. This is where theism creeps into pantheism and prys it away from a rigorous view of reality and into something ultimately no better than another wish thinking theism.