(October 9, 2014 at 3:41 am)Alex K Wrote: And how the last item irks me. Not only because it's blatantly dishonest on their side.
The first one is likewise: it's a supposedly scientific piece of research, yet it was written by a journalist who was stretching the definition of religious belief well beyond its limitations. Apparently, having an internal monologue or enjoying happy endings in narratives are signs of religious faith, so long as it can all be spun into that tired old canard, "atheist secretly believe in god!"

Actually, the whole site is like that; when it's not misinterpreting scientific findings to spin them into religious confirmation, they're representing bad sources- or no sources at all, in the case of amateur writing from non-scientists- as good ones. The entire operation relies on you not fact checking even a little bit.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!