(October 9, 2014 at 6:33 pm)ForumMember77 Wrote: Seems to fit their MO. Very bad chance of survival for the attacker, so heaven all but guaranteed, good chance of HUGE civilian casualties if he plays his cards right.
Why isn't the west really doing anything about this, doesn't it seem plausible ?
What options are available ?
Don't anyone say more "aid to Africa"............. yes, we know, there's a mess in Africa the aid must flow because they can't clean it up themselves. As per usual.
We don't even have screenings for people traveling to the UK, as far as I'm aware. Is it really so far fetched an idea ?
Yes, it's pretty far-fetched. Ebola is one of those disease that's pretty difficult to catch, so weaponisation of it isn't a very likely scenario. About like weaponising chlamydia.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax