(October 10, 2014 at 1:35 am)Zidneya Wrote: But instead I mention of a website that claims how creationists had actually come up with theories and info that they claim support creationism. So I dunno what are you complaining about.
Not complaining - just drawing a parallel.
(October 10, 2014 at 1:35 am)Zidneya Wrote: I name my threads the way I want them to. Oh and guess what I like to make funny titles. I like to make interesting thread names. It gets more views. That's the reason and no offense but I don't think that is a secret to anyone. And I'm not the only one who does that nor I think is wrong doing that.
Misrepresenting the content through a provocative title to increase viewership - hmm... where have I seen that before?
(October 10, 2014 at 1:35 am)Zidneya Wrote: What are those arguments exactly? Because all I do is mention a website sponsored by creationists that claim(and I say claim because since I'm not gonna read all those articles nor I have a PHD to refute what's exposed in them I neither confirm nor deny what's written in them) shows evidence of intelligent design and flaws in atheism. And also suggest to my fellow atheists that in the maybe in the future they may hear of this website as evidence from creationists. How does that debunks creationism?
Don't get me wrong I'm all into debunking creationism so if I imply this in one of my previous statements please explain it to me in which and how.
Because as far as I'm concerned I'm willing to make threads to debunk creationisms however this ain't one of them.
And what if I decide to debunk creationism? Who are you to lecture me what I should and shouldn't do? And why you say debunking creationism like if it's a bad thing? Who the hell are you to tell me how to make my threads? Ha?
Except, I didn't tell you what to do or how to do any of that? I simply drew a parallel between this thread and the website - the titles in both cases misrepresent the content.
