RE: Weaponisation of Ebola by Muslim terrorists
October 16, 2014 at 2:54 am
(This post was last modified: October 16, 2014 at 2:57 am by Fidel_Castronaut.)
(October 15, 2014 at 6:38 pm)ForumMember77 Wrote:(October 15, 2014 at 4:53 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Again, I don't think you could qualify that statement with evidence. There's no knowing what people from a different state would do when put into the same context that many poor and destitute Liberians or Sierra leoneans [sic] and are facing right now.You neglected the question I suggested you ask, yourself.
If other countries stopped aid to Africa, for whatever reason, what would happen ?
We both know, their population would reconcile itself with the societal construct of the peoples within.
I didn't answer because You edited the response.
Anyway, what African state are you talking about? Who do you mean when you say 'Africa'? Africa is not homogenous, there are massive divides between North and South and east and west.
I don't think the question you're asking makes any sense unless we actually look at the proportion of GDP that can be attributed to revenue streams created as a direct result of international financial aid. You'd need to be able to demonstrate that there is enough of a direct proportional link between aid and population demographics in a given area.
I have to keep reiterating this - the west as normatively defined takes more money out of 'Africa' then we put in. A lot more.
So, rather than keep answering id like your evidence and thoughts as requested on my previous points, please. Then we can start addressing the question of aid being responsible for population growth in any given African State.