The Finance newspaper Wall Street Journal thinks atheists have watered down our message.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/david-ske...1414105461
The title of this WSJ article pisses me off. It assumes that the "Horsemen" that atheists are aware of were formerly bloodthirsty genocidal maniacs who went from Saul to being Paul. Harris was never bloodthirsty but simply blunt. Same with Dawkins. And the much maligned Hitchens. Atheists have always been kind, we simply tell you what we think and don't sugar coat it.
I also find it funny that WSJ would Title it this considering Ben acting like Sam and Bill were advocating sticking Muslims in ovens. It's only been a couple weeks since that interview, I do not think Sam's views have swung lion to mouse that quickly.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/david-ske...1414105461
The title of this WSJ article pisses me off. It assumes that the "Horsemen" that atheists are aware of were formerly bloodthirsty genocidal maniacs who went from Saul to being Paul. Harris was never bloodthirsty but simply blunt. Same with Dawkins. And the much maligned Hitchens. Atheists have always been kind, we simply tell you what we think and don't sugar coat it.
I also find it funny that WSJ would Title it this considering Ben acting like Sam and Bill were advocating sticking Muslims in ovens. It's only been a couple weeks since that interview, I do not think Sam's views have swung lion to mouse that quickly.
