RE: On the nature of evidence.
October 25, 2014 at 4:10 pm
(This post was last modified: October 25, 2014 at 4:11 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(October 25, 2014 at 3:55 pm)trmof Wrote:(October 25, 2014 at 3:53 pm)Alex K Wrote: Let's not act like it's the atheists job to come up with a phenomenology for *your* pet fantasy.
You tell me - what evidence do you think would be compelling?
If you're not willing to answer my questions, why should I answer yours?
Because you started with a special pleading. His question is but a polite way of giving you the courtesy opportunity to paste over your embarassing opening of a discussion with a logical fallacy. You don't seem to recognize let along appreciate the favor. If you can't answer the charge and restructure your opening without the fallacy, then you have no coherent and potentially sound position warranting any further discussion.