RE: On the nature of evidence.
October 25, 2014 at 6:02 pm
(This post was last modified: October 25, 2014 at 6:03 pm by trmof.)
(October 25, 2014 at 5:56 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote: It IS your responsibility to provide supporting evidence when you make a claim that you want others to acknowledge.I'm not making a claim I want anybody to acknowledge. I'm proposing some interesting ideas about the philosophical nature of evidence and how different people approach it. I never brought up my religious beliefs until I was specifically asked about them, and I don't care if you acknowledge them or not
That being the case, is there something else regarding the topic you'd like to discuss? Because you seem more interested in making this about me personally and I'm not interested.
(October 25, 2014 at 5:58 pm)Stimbo Wrote: How about instead of playing "Guess My God", you actually set out what this god is about? As I said, we can't examine the god since it's continually being defined as untestable. So let's see some statements about its nature, its abilities and whatever, and we can examine those.
On the other hand, a god that repeatedly fails the same basic reality test that even microbes are able to pass can be put to bed right now, along with this discussion.
I already did that several posts back. I'm afraid you missed it.