On the nature of evidence.

[Chas]

You wrote "it's already been fixed well enough for you. What more would constitute fixing it at this point?"

You presumed is was enough. Don't you even read your own posts?

And, yes, lacking evidence opinions are all worth very little. And you still don't understand what constitutes evidence.

I don't think that word means what you think it means, because it makes no sense in this context.


And I suggest you take your passive-aggressive crap elsewhere.

I am not passive-aggressive, while you have clearly moved from passive-aggression to openly aggressive-agressive during the course of your comments and have since resorted to outright name calling. Also you are correct, I misused the word quisling. I meant to call you an inadequate and inferior intellect. I'm glad we could clear that up. Please tell me if you know the actual Q word I was thinking of. Now please stop trying to bait me into an argument so you can feel good about being mean to someone you've never met for the rest of the day, as there is no other point in continuing the conversation. If you would like to sign off without using an insult I would be more than happy to let you have the last word. Otherwise, I'm going to keep pointing out how immature you're being, and you will presumably continue to prove me right until one of us gets bored and leaves.

I have no desire to continue with you.