On the nature of evidence.

[trmof]

The standard of evidence for the creator of the universe have to be really high. You are lowering them to a ridiculously low level as everyone here pointed out. Your attempt to explain why your god no longer does miracles is laughable. It makes your god look weak.

What you also missed is that you can show that you are talking to a "higher" being. There are plenty of scientific mysteries that still need to be answered. The creator of the universe can easily answer these questions without breaking any physical laws he supposedly put in place. So ask your friend in your head what is dark energy and how do we prove it.

I am not interested in anybody's opinions about the nature of my presumably non-existent God. If the don't like him neither I nor him particularly care.

Giving mankind undiscovered secrets of physics would be very unwise for even a PERSON to do, let alone a God. The first thing we have done with any new piece of scientific knowledge is start exploring the possibilities of weaponizing it.

---

So what could a God do that would personally convince you of it's existence?

Let's start with the basics - your god is supposed to be an intelligent immaterial entity. Start with proving that intelligence can exist without a material medium and then we'll go to the next step.

I never claimed him to be immaterial.