On the nature of evidence.

[Mudhammam]

This is nothing but your intuition on healthy social conduct. You have already stated that personal intuition is not a reliable indicator of reality, therefore I will apply your own standard to this statement and discount it as false and irrelevant on it's face.

Simply because you have nothing but assertion and intuition to ground your vain philosophies in does not implicate anyone else in such laziness but yourself. 10+ pages of rebuttals to your absurd suggestion that evidence for God exists on account of a person's feelings or uniformed conclusions about the conditions of causation in immediate experience is sufficient for me to point out that your insistence to the contrary is either dishonest or delusional, or you're simply not sophisticated enough to formulate an affirmation of your claims. That you thought I was speaking about "healthy social conduct" only serves to illuminate your dissonance from the conversation you initiated. In fact, I'm quite enjoying your sheer lack of cogency while others take to it like sport.