Yeah, you provided the data for me ironically.
If you had of just told me why you thought we got more out of Africa than we give in aid, why you believe in what you believe, instead of trying to bury me in bullshlt you could google I wouldn't have had any. Your 'evidence' at best does nothing for your argument, and at worst is evidence to the contrary, calling that inept sourcing is an understatement.
The only working link you provided is proof in favour of what I said. Also, your argument that if we stopped oil companies stealing from us is noted. It still doesn't help the African country you used as an example. Unless you are suggesting we let them over charge because they cant maintain their society.
Argue that if you will. But call it what it is........... more aid.
I suggest throwing money at this problem is creating a population bubble in these places, where their societal construct can't service the needs of the population because we are artificially boosting their numbers with aid. Too which you were essentially arguing, 'more aid' to fix the problem.
I told you my perception on this matter is heavily influenced by constant social media reinforcement and was open to the possibility of being wrong. That whilst I could easily find evidence, as you proved, it does nothing for the reason why I believe it is the case anyway.
When I asked you to repay with the same honesty you went, as I said, to look for a filler instead of being intellectually honest. I was open to the idea I was wrong, and still am, you never were.
Now your calling for people to take note that you provided evidence......... ergo you win. It's not about winning. I actually wanted to know where you got this idea from and why you hold it, and still do if you decide to answer.
If you had of just told me why you thought we got more out of Africa than we give in aid, why you believe in what you believe, instead of trying to bury me in bullshlt you could google I wouldn't have had any. Your 'evidence' at best does nothing for your argument, and at worst is evidence to the contrary, calling that inept sourcing is an understatement.
The only working link you provided is proof in favour of what I said. Also, your argument that if we stopped oil companies stealing from us is noted. It still doesn't help the African country you used as an example. Unless you are suggesting we let them over charge because they cant maintain their society.
Argue that if you will. But call it what it is........... more aid.
I suggest throwing money at this problem is creating a population bubble in these places, where their societal construct can't service the needs of the population because we are artificially boosting their numbers with aid. Too which you were essentially arguing, 'more aid' to fix the problem.
I told you my perception on this matter is heavily influenced by constant social media reinforcement and was open to the possibility of being wrong. That whilst I could easily find evidence, as you proved, it does nothing for the reason why I believe it is the case anyway.
When I asked you to repay with the same honesty you went, as I said, to look for a filler instead of being intellectually honest. I was open to the idea I was wrong, and still am, you never were.
Now your calling for people to take note that you provided evidence......... ergo you win. It's not about winning. I actually wanted to know where you got this idea from and why you hold it, and still do if you decide to answer.
