(October 31, 2014 at 10:24 pm)Rhythm Wrote: That's a bit vague for a prediction. I don't think it would pass peer review. Bit like the weatherman "Tonights weather will be dark, ending with light at dawn."
Actually I don't like that last statement and would like to take it back. I don't know what atheists thought before the discovery of quantum wierdness. I only assume they thought such things. I just think MA criticism that it would have gotten a check mark if predicted ahead of time is a little ludicrous. He's taking a position that if someone made the prediction ahead of time....that prediction somehow changes the evidence. It does not.
