RE: Did Hubble can it wrong?
November 1, 2014 at 4:51 pm
(This post was last modified: November 1, 2014 at 4:58 pm by little_monkey.)
(November 1, 2014 at 12:49 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote:(November 1, 2014 at 11:59 am)Chuck Wrote: The link is no good.The link works, just delete the comma ',' at the end.
Thanks
(November 1, 2014 at 3:46 pm)Surgenator Wrote: This blog is ignoring all the supporting evidence for the hubble constant and the expansion of the universe that has nothing to do with shifts in wavelenth. Link
The Hubble is constant in regard to space, it is not in regard to time. In most books you will see the Hubble denoted as H(t), to signify its dependency on time. Secondly, the expansion of the universe has everything to do with redshifts.
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift
http://www.exploratorium.edu/hubble/tools/doppler.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hba...ubble.html
http://coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu/cosmi...shift.html
http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/...-in-the-e/
http://astro.berkeley.edu/~mwhite/darkma...shift.html
And zillion websites that will confirm this