Atheism = Desperation

[Esquilax]

Now you are well on your way to understanding why the first mover is the necessary to regulate the movement of things from potentiality to actuality. For something to be non-random means that there must be a more fundamental causes. Follow the logic, Esquilax. If you need some help, Feser's "Last Superstition" is a good start for someone just starting to learn about Neo-Scholasticism.

Or it could just be that everything is not, in fact, possible. By your logic a rock must be designed because it will never just instantaneously lift off and fly into space. Since when has existence within a limited set of variables ever implied design?

Besides, I've already dispensed with this first mover crap. I know it agrees with what you want to be true in the most simplistic way possible, and so you're willing to accept it no matter what, but "here's a set of blunt assertions about the universe, here's a problem with those assertions that hasn't been demonstrated, and so there must be a thing which breaks the rules I've already bluntly asserted in order to resolve a problem I can't demonstrate exists," is not a cogent argument. It's a rambling, incoherent mess of assertions that do not in any way conform to reality, based upon definitions that I'm not required to, nor do I, accept.