(November 3, 2014 at 10:26 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:(November 3, 2014 at 10:17 pm)Jenny A Wrote: I didn't actually intend to go quite that far, but I will now. Anyone who cannot demonstrate god or that he is much more probably than not, and yet believes in him is acting irrationally.
Why do you have to demonstrate it?
Because unless it's demonstrable, it's not rational.
(November 3, 2014 at 10:26 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:Quote:Absent proof that god is at a minimum more probable than not, yes no one can rationally claim to know god exists.
What do you mean by proof? Is there a rational argument or scientific evidence free-will exists? Is it irrational to believe in free-will as a result as well?
Non sequitur. I can't prove free will exists either. I like to pretend it does, but it's just my robotic self programmed to pretend.

(November 3, 2014 at 10:26 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:Quote:If "spiritual knowledge" had any validity, the sensors would sense the same god, yet they don't.
The same can be said about morality. If there was a such thing as morality, we would all sense the same thing, yet we don't.
Exactly. There aren't any universal moral truths.
(November 3, 2014 at 10:26 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:Quote:Tiberius is more tolerant of fools, than I am. But I do believe theists at least think they have knowledge.
No Tiberius is not an ego quest of belittling all Theists, that's why he can rationally see he is in no rational position to be anything but agnostic to whether people have knowledge of God or don't.
Sorry if you feel belittled, but you have no evidence of god.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.