Systematically Dismantling Atheism

[Exian]

[quote='Exian]Lets just use the increments we see on earth and let our intelligence play the role of the highest possible achievement in that arena. We start with the emergence of life, which we then build on to create ever increasing intelligence until we arrive at us. It's at this point that you would then state humans have created everything. Do you see the giant hole in your argument?"

Why would I state that at that point?

And at every step along the way an intelligent life form that is 1% superior in intelligence/attributes can logically & rationally exist from the perspective of the life form that is 1% inferior, and at no point along the way does this chain of slightly superior life forms become an irrational concept (i.e flying spaghetti monsters) from the perspective of the preceding slightly less intelligent life form. Therefore in this chain of logically possible life forms, the existence of life form 100000^100000 (i.e creator of the universe, thus God) becomes as logical a concept as life form 1.1 is.

My bolding

I don't know why, but there it is.

"The reason we can agree on a 1% higher intelligence is that we can look at the current gradient existing today, as well as our own evolutionary journey. But even if we use this reasoning to arrive at the maximal level of intelligence, how does this intelligence then go back and create everything that it built itself on for its own existence?"

This brings up another topic. I believe God "evolved" (via self direction) before the singularity and before the 2nd law of thermodynamics existed. The first law is never violated, therefore we must believe energy in some form existed for all of eternity in the past. And because entropy can not be eternal, usable energy must have existed forever in the past. Therefore this eternal usable energy had literally forever to become aware of its self, i.e. “I think therefore I am” (abiogenesis of God).

What does "evolved" via self direction mean? Is "evolved" in quotes because you're making a claim about a state of existence where we have no idea the laws in which it works? You said it yourself- "before the singularity" "before the 2nd law"- so before anything of which we have any knowledge, or methods for observation. This may be the safest gap to cram in a god. I'll definitely need sources to swallow any of this.

And any life form that exists in a place in which entropy does not exist, can never die, and any life form that can never die must eventually become/evolve into an all knowing all powerful being, no matter how painstakingly long it may take.

How can you claim any knowledge of this when you have arrived at this point using evolution; a theory under the laws of our known universe?

Therefore if the eternal "something" exists, the chances of it becoming a sentient all knowing being is 1/1 (100%) because it has literally all of eternity for it to happen. Thus if the eternal something exists, God must also exist. And atheistic science knows this very well, this is why they need an illogical "something from nothing" hypothesis to reject God from existing.

Listen, even if your philosophical argument is sound, it gets us zero results. Atheistic science, otherwise known as "science", is concerned with actually working and getting results. We may never have a chance to peer beyond our universe, so I guess you have found a cozy place to hide your god. Let me know when you find a way to demonstrate it.