Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 24, 2025, 9:01 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Did Hubble can it wrong?
#25
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong?
(November 4, 2014 at 6:46 pm)little_monkey Wrote:
(November 4, 2014 at 1:14 pm)Surgenator Wrote: How can you miss "Therefore this formula only applies when R^* is at least as large as r_s." I bolded for you. You also missed the "not defined" part in your bolded region. How can the equation give a value of the redshift if it is not defined for R^* < r_s? Reading comprehension FAIL.

And what do you think the "s" stands for in "r_s"? It stands for the Schwarzchild radius. And what is that? Google it, you are embarrassing yourself.

The author makes it clear: if the light emanates when R > "r_s", the Scwarzschild radius, meaning OUTSIDE the black hole, it will go to infinity. If R is equal to "r_s" or smaller than "r_s", meaning the light emantes from INSIDE the black hole, it won't escape.

Your lack of reading comprehension is impressive. Do you actually think this equation is for the photon going inward instead of outward? Do you actually think they're only talking about black holes? Do you think that the mention of the Scwarzchild radius means it only applies to black holes? I have news for you then. Everything that has mass has a Scwarzchild radius: electrons, protons, humans, planets, stars, galaxies, etc...

Quote:
Quote:Also, you are forgetting the most fundamental rule of scientific proofs, your model predictions have to match the observations.

My derivation predicts Hubble equation which is an OBSERVATION.
No they don't. Take any two galaxy's average redshifts and mass, and do the calculations.

Quote:
Quote:In equation 5, you did binomial expansion that works only if d1/R is much less than one. Later, your trying to apply your solution to cases where d1/R will no longer be much less than one. It will be much greater than one. Your binomial approximation is longer justified.

Which part of "Rsource is infinite" don't you get?
Confusedhock: Wow, I didn't realize how stupid your hypothesis is.

Do you not realize the Gauss's law breaks down when you make thing infinitely big? Guass's law is derived conservatation of flux that enters the enclosed region has to exit it. When the enclosed region is infinite, the flux can enter but not exit.

You conclusions are flawed.

Quote:YOU ARE A TOTAL WASTE.
So much for a civil discussion.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Did Hubble can it wrong? - by little_monkey - November 1, 2014 at 11:45 am
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by Anomalocaris - November 1, 2014 at 11:59 am
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by Aoi Magi - November 1, 2014 at 12:49 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by little_monkey - November 1, 2014 at 4:51 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by Surgenator - November 1, 2014 at 7:56 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by little_monkey - November 2, 2014 at 11:26 am
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by Surgenator - November 2, 2014 at 1:25 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by little_monkey - November 3, 2014 at 12:19 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by Surgenator - November 3, 2014 at 1:39 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by little_monkey - November 3, 2014 at 4:19 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by Surgenator - November 3, 2014 at 5:29 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by little_monkey - November 3, 2014 at 6:22 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by Surgenator - November 3, 2014 at 7:12 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by little_monkey - November 4, 2014 at 9:09 am
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by Surgenator - November 4, 2014 at 1:14 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by little_monkey - November 4, 2014 at 6:46 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by Surgenator - November 4, 2014 at 7:48 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by Alex K - November 3, 2014 at 2:29 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by popeyespappy - November 1, 2014 at 12:42 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by Surgenator - November 1, 2014 at 3:46 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by Minimalist - November 1, 2014 at 3:49 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by vorlon13 - November 1, 2014 at 8:11 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by vorlon13 - November 2, 2014 at 12:41 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by Alex K - November 2, 2014 at 1:45 pm
RE: Did Hubble can it wrong? - by vorlon13 - November 3, 2014 at 12:25 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Please do correct me if I am getting this wrong. Brian37 6 1452 July 8, 2022 at 10:07 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Kosh 5 2407 March 22, 2016 at 12:52 am
Last Post: Kosh
  NASA Hubble Finds a True Blue Planet pocaracas 2 2321 July 13, 2013 at 7:04 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Was Newton wrong? little_monkey 7 3057 May 31, 2013 at 1:14 am
Last Post: Colanth
  Hubble glimpses 13.3 Byo galaxies Jackalope 10 6009 December 13, 2012 at 9:17 am
Last Post: KichigaiNeko
  Hubble is dead, long live hubble 2, and hubble 3. Anomalocaris 5 2482 June 5, 2012 at 3:31 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  Galileo was wrong, the Church was right Entropist 27 12153 September 18, 2010 at 7:48 am
Last Post: Zen Badger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)