RE: Atheism = Desperation
November 6, 2014 at 3:42 pm
(This post was last modified: November 6, 2014 at 3:44 pm by WinterHold.)
(November 2, 2014 at 2:06 pm)Beccs Wrote: "But when I think about a difference between "Islam" & "Atheism", "
Atheists don't cut peoples' heads off in an attempt to control them and seize lots of land from anyone we can conquer/slaughter?
As to the rest: atheism is the default position. A child not taught the god concept will not come up with the god concept on its own, so long as it has access to science and education.
Oh really ? oh really stalin was a muslim eh ?
The Chinese communist government that run protestors with tanks is composed of Muslims, right ?
What kind of logic is this, my deer ? Congratulations, you just proved you're a MSM consumer

Keep drinking the wine your MSM is pouring at you until you're drunk. Just don't forget to lock the door ; crazy Muslims who cut heads are capable of teleporting via walls (I dare you you'll believe it if the dick in the suit said it).
About the default state of atheism , it's not up to you to judge. Where is the study you're basing this on ?
Above all, not all people are "converted" by their parents. Or did the MSM told you that the crazy Muslims ALL, are Muslims by mandatory conversion, that's why they deserve to be nuked ?
The smell of little ones cooked under american bombs doesn't touch a nerve ? how monstrous, savage & cruel ?
FifthElement
Well trying to twist the religion to fit a theory is something I never do. My interpretations & word meanings are so similar -if not identical- to many Sunni interpreters.
If science & Islam don't fit each other , I'll be an atheist tomorrow. But to each his believe ; you see.
So the universe is expanding just like god said in the Quran (without any tricks to twist an old verse to match that), why would I deny such a fact ?
Mister Agenda
Maybe ; if I converted to atheism someday..
Bad Wolf
Quote:I asked how we recognize design, not a design.
Sorry, I edited my answer from
I mainly speak about my own approach here.
The goal & the blueprint.
If there's a certain goal to be achieved & a blueprint that enforces constant behavior/response if some conditions are triggered, then it's a design for me.
to
I mainly speak about my own approach here in recognizing designs .
My main approach in recognizing design is via checking if a certain implementation contains a goal & a blueprint.
If there's a certain goal to be achieved & a blueprint that enforces constant behavior/response if some conditions are triggered, then it's a design for me.
Quote:Okay..... how would you tell that a statue of George Washington was designed?
1)The statue serves a goal (glorifying a domestic figure as a symbol for the people of America ; just like the mini-statueses of the shit eater bug ancient Egyptians made)
2)The statue must have a blueprint even if it was inside the carver's head alone.
Stimbo
Then probably I used the wrong verse in the wrong place ; which is an error that is not so inevitable since I'm a young free thinker who does things on his own. .
though the big bang itself was described in the verse of that "earth & heaven were one...".