RE: The definition of Kind.
November 17, 2014 at 6:57 pm
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2014 at 6:59 pm by Exian.)
Quote:In The Genesis Record, (1976) when Henry Morris states:Quoted from Min's link. My bolding.
“ It is significant that the phrase “after his kind” occurs ten times in the first chapter of Genesis. Whatever precisely is meant by the term “kind” (Hebrew min), it does indicate the limitations of variation. Each organism was to reproduce after its own kind, not after some other kind.[2]
Regardless of the inaccuracies present with "kind", its worthy to note that the author distinguishes between animals giving birth to the same offspring that they are, and a case where one animal might give birth to a different animal, which suggests that there is an idea out there some where that one animal can give birth to an entirely different animal. Evolution certainly doesn't make this claim, and reality doesn't act this way. What is the author trying to dispute?
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue