(November 21, 2014 at 3:58 pm)Rhythm Wrote:(November 21, 2014 at 3:55 pm)Asmodee Wrote: So you're saying it is possible to be simply "agnostic". Thank you.Of course, but I don't think it's possible to be agnostic about -just anything-. Suppose I said that "cowboy killers" were elephants? Do you believe that I smoke cowboy killers?
-ps, I didn't ask you how much information you had - it isn't relevant - yet....but that -is- one way of avoiding participation, granted.
You can move the goalposts on a specific example all you want. It's not going to prove your point. And yes, people can be agnostic about anything. My brain is not your brain is not his brain. We don't all think alike and we don't all have the same understanding about any given thing. Maybe YOU can't be agnostic about a specific thing. That doesn't mean I can't. My understanding of that thing may be different. My thought process on that thing may be different. You are acting as if there is a "right way" and a "wrong way" to think; as if any given thought process can be definitively quantified and boiled down to one of two simplistic answers for every single person an Earth. The claim is simply ludicrous.