Yes it does make sense. Your failure to understand is not my baggage.
Now let me explain again.
1. As an average our CLIMATE has taught cops to fear the worst and dominate. That is taking into account a bigger sample in a larger context.
2. Outside this event, humans when you confront them in close proximity with an aggressive tone, will react to that space and tone. Again, this is evolutionary having nothing to do with moral judgments. You do not have to justify something, but by observing it you can seek to reduce such situations.
3. Outside our species we see the same actions and reactions in other primates and mammals. A subordinate in a group under certain conditions will submit to the alpha male, but under other conditions that same subordinate can react negatively depending on how that alpha male approaches them.
4. The conditions that lead to this particular event are a collection of social conditioning by society. It is a failure by society to accept a real problem.
I criticize Wilsion's actions as part of a larger climate. If you fail to take into account the bigger picture as part of a lager sample, you do not help either Brown or Wilson. You simply perpetuate the same conditions.
You have a simplistic view of society selling you scripts and you make one event the issue which is not a good sample rate to make a reasonable explanation as to why either Brown did what he did or why Wilson did what he did.
Instead of blindly protecting Wilson I'd suggest you literally go to places where these events happen the most, open your ears when those who live there talk, and shut up and listen. Otherwise you are merely part of the problem.
Now let me explain again.
1. As an average our CLIMATE has taught cops to fear the worst and dominate. That is taking into account a bigger sample in a larger context.
2. Outside this event, humans when you confront them in close proximity with an aggressive tone, will react to that space and tone. Again, this is evolutionary having nothing to do with moral judgments. You do not have to justify something, but by observing it you can seek to reduce such situations.
3. Outside our species we see the same actions and reactions in other primates and mammals. A subordinate in a group under certain conditions will submit to the alpha male, but under other conditions that same subordinate can react negatively depending on how that alpha male approaches them.
4. The conditions that lead to this particular event are a collection of social conditioning by society. It is a failure by society to accept a real problem.
I criticize Wilsion's actions as part of a larger climate. If you fail to take into account the bigger picture as part of a lager sample, you do not help either Brown or Wilson. You simply perpetuate the same conditions.
You have a simplistic view of society selling you scripts and you make one event the issue which is not a good sample rate to make a reasonable explanation as to why either Brown did what he did or why Wilson did what he did.
Instead of blindly protecting Wilson I'd suggest you literally go to places where these events happen the most, open your ears when those who live there talk, and shut up and listen. Otherwise you are merely part of the problem.
