(November 30, 2014 at 5:47 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: When I was in high school guitar hero was a insanely popular game, everyone loved it. But many in the music business soon found out that many in to guitar hero had a harder time learning real guitar. It was because they made assumptions about the song based on their guitar hero experience. Experience and assumptions they made about the song would be flatly wrong.
I wonder if archeology suffers from the same problem. Perhaps we have been assuming the bible is even remotely accurate. I would propose that we throw the book out wholesale and try to eliminate all assumptions of the ancient world based on the Bible. That way we can start with a clean slate, and draw our conclusions based on the historical evidence. If that eventually does prove the bible accurate then so be it.
Many of the archaeologists who specifically try to prove the bible through their digs in the Middle East find that they cannot do so and that the physical evidence does not back up the stories.
There are, of course, those who make up all sorts of nonsense to back up their assumptions, but those are few, fortunately.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"