RE: Ferguson - Sane Atheist Voices
December 4, 2014 at 10:16 pm
(This post was last modified: December 4, 2014 at 10:24 pm by Sterben.)
The direct evidence that was presented to us from sources was in defense of Darren and against Michael Brown, although, a skinny teenager should of posed no threat to the officers life. He was just incompetent& inexperienced, Michael Brown did attack the officer but, Darren reacted just like anyone else would of with the evidence at hand. Michael could of been on high on meth, crack cocaine, or any other substance. Using basic statics, young men in there 20's and younger it is quite common for them to use drugs. I tried these substances when I was younger and it does give you a sense of power. Darren did respond this situation wrongful I think but, as a young police officer he did what most rational people would do when attacked. The media and the other groups just wanted ratings, so they blew up an racial issue which is popular to do so by the media. His death was wrongful yes but, Darren did not commit murder directly; it was more self-defense. It's not about whether a crime was committed or not. it's an issue of a racial indent gone wrong and blame is trying to put on someone; Michael Brown was a dumb-ass that's all. I'm either pro-police or pro-protesters, just a neutral party who thinks there should a be " Michael Brown is a dumb-ass side of the arguments"