That's a logical fallasy!

[robvalue]

Ok I now have no idea what you are talking about. I've explained several times that an argument containing a fallacy does not demonstrate truth. You seem to be saying that you can just ignore fallacies and say the result "may" still be valid. So that's good enough. Good enough for you maybe, not to someone who cares about actual truth.

Sorry I am really confused as to your point. I get it, you don't like labels, that's your personal preference. They don't have to be used insultingly. If you take offence every time you see one, that's up to you. You can always ask for explanations, and if they are not forthcoming, you can ignore the person. Put them on block, they are a dick. There's plenty of ways to be a dick, that's just one.

But you seem to be making some point about it not mattering whether or not an argument contains fallacies. But then you tell me off for analysing this statement. I don't know what else I can say, so I'll leave it here. Nice discussing with you