(July 18, 2010 at 2:59 pm)Darwinian Wrote: No it doesn't. This is just your feeble attempt to make some obscure verse or two from your very strange book fit into string and M theory which, is so over your head and that of your daft book that I think it has to be the singular most ridiculous claim that any theist has ever come up with on this forum. And that's saying something believe me as we've had our fair share of fruitcakes!!
And don't you dare use one of my hero's to support your insane and rabbid claims that somehow your book is full of scientific knowledge. And anyway, string and M theory are still just that and are not scientific fact so how do you square that??
It's quite clear that you have absolutely no idea what he is talking about. You're just plucking odd little phrases and analogies and mutating them to your own ends.
Mo3's encounters with fact result in what can most adequately be described as resembling a cheap whore lying in a ditch mutilated by tractor-tread.
Not a pretty picture.
.
