If

[Surgenator]

Where is the evidence for the "non-visible part?" And personal experiences are not evidence because they're unreliable. schizophrenic patients see things; it doesn't what they see is real.

Ok. so let me ask you one thing.
Suppose you are in love with somebody.......i pop up and ask you to give me evidence that you really are in love with someone.

I prove my love with my actions and my intentions to the person of interest.

How do you think you can prove to me that your love is real and such love produce a nice feeling?

Love is a nice feeling.

I was indirectly refering to people experiencing high accelarations, i.e. fighter pilots in centrifuges. No drugs or medications were involved. All natural, same effect as NDEs without their lives endangered.
As a side, what is the difference between the dopamine made in a lab and the dopamine made by your body. I'll give you a hint, nothing.

Once again you are making a terrible confusion.
Even accelarations come under the so called induced ways of creating an artificial feeling that you got an NDE.
Drugs and medications although are a different things they also can cause an induced feeling of an NDE so here we got a huge difference between natural death and induced death feeling.
Dopamine and other types of hormones like melatonin are produced by the glands only when the individual need it and the natural death also come when there is a valid reason for it so although the dopamine and other hormone can be produced in lab the final effects can not be the same.
It would be to compare making love with a masturbation.

LOL. The distiction you're trying to wedge in doesn't exist because the resulting NDEs are the same. For example, if you drove to Las Vegas using highway 93 and I used highway 95, we would still arive at Las Vegas. The method doesn't matter if the effects are the same.

The fact Micheal Shermer changes his mind doesn't change his arguments. Please address his arguments not the man.

Shermer is a professional denialist.
He enjoy deny everything without even trying to experience for himself what he is denying.
He search here and there until he find someone who agree with him and then saying that he can prove that such and such belief is wrong based on somebody else idea.
Again he is a bit like you that believe that there is no difference between a natural death an an induce feeling of death.

Please address Sherman's arguments and not waste time assisinating his character.

Every heard of the "no true scotsman fallacy." If you haven't, look it up because you're commiting it here. You cannot reject yoga practitioners just because they don't fit into your definition.

Put it in the way that you most like it.
To me your comparison doesn't make any sense at all.

Why doesn't make sense to you?