RE: Toxoplasmosis of Rage :: Analysis of the activism of lies
December 29, 2014 at 7:48 am
(This post was last modified: December 29, 2014 at 7:49 am by simplemoss.)
That article is one of the worst written peices I've ever read. Re-iterating points mid fucking paragraph circular reasoning. Little or know actual conclusion the godamn thing appears too just end mid article
I'd like too respond too that garbled bit of writing since it took so much effort on my part to even understand what the fuck the writer was talking about.
but I can't cause I can only guess as too what his point was?
Something to do cat poop and tumblr.com I guess??
I wamna make points about yellow journalism or about understanding social media dialogue is just words when 90+% of communication has nothing too do with what words your using
But I have problems critiquing an article that seems too make no clear fucking point at all?
I can say PETA relies on donations and it's nowhere near their fucking job to pay for poor peoples water bills but if they'd like too pay for their bills as long as their vegetarians I see no problem
But I have a feeling this garbled excuse for an article wasn't even hinting at that point.
Maybe their point was something about forming rape charities idk
I'd like too respond too that garbled bit of writing since it took so much effort on my part to even understand what the fuck the writer was talking about.
but I can't cause I can only guess as too what his point was?
Something to do cat poop and tumblr.com I guess??
I wamna make points about yellow journalism or about understanding social media dialogue is just words when 90+% of communication has nothing too do with what words your using
But I have problems critiquing an article that seems too make no clear fucking point at all?
I can say PETA relies on donations and it's nowhere near their fucking job to pay for poor peoples water bills but if they'd like too pay for their bills as long as their vegetarians I see no problem
But I have a feeling this garbled excuse for an article wasn't even hinting at that point.
Maybe their point was something about forming rape charities idk