(July 28, 2010 at 1:07 am)tackattack Wrote: So if faith in evidence (subjective or not) is proof (seeing as little to no proof is absolute).
Isn't 'proof' absolute and conclusive whilst evidence is not?
Quote:Then how could there ever be absolute proof of God?How can there can be absolute proof of anything?
Quote: My point was there could been proof for God based on subjective evidence.And how do you come to this conclusion?
Quote: There in lies the usefullness.Of faith? What has 'subjective evidence' got to do with 'faith'? If you have evidence or reasoning of any form what use does 'faith' have? You naturally trust whatever reasoning/evidence is reasonable if you are a rational and reasonable person - where does 'faith' come into that when it comes to rationality and reasonableness?