(January 4, 2015 at 11:15 am)Chili Wrote:(January 4, 2015 at 8:11 am)BlackMason Wrote: Someone here gave us a Matt Dillahunty explanation about the necessity of contrasting nature to determine design. So I'm not gonna write on that. Instead I want to make an argument against the teleology of nature.
1) Nature has goals or nature does not have goals.
2) There have been many creatures that have come into existence.
3) There have been many creatures that have since become extinct.
4) Extinction has no purpose.
Therefore nature has no goals.
Nature does not have a mind, but we do.
We may have red hair too, and get a shave,
and then we no longer have red hair,
So obviously we are not our hair.
^^^^^^^^^^^What the?
None of that steamy pile of a metaphor explains anything.
If a Muslim typed what you just did to claim Allah to be the one true god, would you blindly become a Muslim?