Obama is a war criminal

[DeistPaladin]

Dude, you just complained about being insulted.

No, fucktard, I accused you of using ad hominems. There's an important difference between an insult and an ad hominem.

If you're really too stupid to know what the difference is, an ad hominem is using an insult in place of an argument. You never offer anything of substance. You're content to just say "nyth nyth, you're a liberal" and think you really nailed it.

I couldn't possibly give less of a shit what a hopeless, willfully ignorant fucktard like you thinks of me, given how you repeatedly demonstrate that you couldn't assemble a logical argument with a detailed blueprint, carefully labeled component parts and a "how to" video to guide you. When I point out your posts consist of ad hominems, I'm not complaining about my hurt feelings but rather exposing their vapid nature.

Here's a link to a definition of what an ad hominem is, in case you need to read it from another source.

The reason why an Ad Hominem (of any kind) is a fallacy is that the character, circumstances, or actions of a person do not (in most cases) have a bearing on the truth or falsity of the claim being made (or the quality of the argument being made).

I don't even know what you want me to reply to. Some video that you didn't even make?

I've given you plenty of arguments aside from posted links to 3rd party source material but let that go. Who cares who made the video? A good argument is a good argument no matter who made it. Again, you fail to understand how basic logic works.

I'm amazed I even need to explain any of this to you. This is logic 101. You've just proven that just because you're an atheist doesn't mean you're a rational person. However, perhaps I've misjudged you. Maybe it's just that you're too damn lazy to do any better. You have admitted that it's too much work to do any research.

Then again, the ease of "both sides do it" is its greatest selling point. You don't need to do any research. You don't need to figure out what the problems with Washington really are. You don't need to find out who's to blame. You just give a heavy sigh about how "Washington is broken" and assume the truth lies somewhere in the middle.

This assumption is also a logical fallacy (argument to moderation), by the way.

It's pretty hard to debate with you, because you resort to ad hominims and changing the goal posts sooo often. If you were willing to intellectually engage I'd be down for that. Instead you just insult and take great umbrage at everything that's said towards you. I'd (and other people) would be willing to engage with you if you cut the ad hominims, the laziness of just posting someone else's videos and arguments, and the annoying writing style of responding to every sentence in a way that makes editing posts too much of a hassle.

Psychological projection. You've demonstrated repeatedly that you wouldn't know a logical argument if it jumped off your screen and slapped you in the face and have admitted you're too damn lazy to do any research.

When you muster the energy to do some basic research on logical fallacies, you can get back to me.