Detecting design or intent in nature

[Chili]

Our Original Sin equals Plato's State of Oblivion, and therefore shepherds are good news, and are good news without even saying a thing. They just give us a sense of belonging so we will know where the manger is at. That is the only reason for this and then please know that the manger was missing in Matthew as an early foreshadow that hell will be destiny for him.

Ah, yes, Chily, you're quite right. But I have to tell you, that I don't remember shepards in any of my playthroughs. And as for hell, the closest thing I encountered were the Oblivion gates, which were kind of repetitive after a while.

Where you Catholic too? All I can remember is that the pasture was so big that the sheep couldn't get lost, with room to roam and play without end and confession became much like a tall tale telling event.

---

I am telling you that this line:

is Jenny's, and not mine

Then instead of complaining about it in open thread, you should have reported it so the error could be corrected. By not doing so, you've created a metric shit-ton of extra work for the Staff. Thanks.

Not to worry, thanks. All I know is that when I read that line it could not be mine because I would never write something like that.

---

... These potential changes obviously would be inter-generational as they must bring changes about that are permanent and in the right direction as seen from the outside. After all, evolution is in response to the need to survive and flourish in an environment that is involutional to demand that changes must be made, or at least, there must be an awareness that changes may have to be made, or perhaps there is a continuum in which changes are made.

You might want to, oh I don't know, read a bit about evolution before you try to use or refute it in your 'proof' for gods.

I am telling you that Gen.1, 2 and 3 explain how the intelligent design is built inside the species, where Lord God is Plato's genus and the difference is made known by the essence we see that we call the son who brings logos to the fore, that would account for the difference between [bare naked] animal and the being in charge. For Plato this was a re-emergence and then we first see the body as byproduct with new life emerging from within.