(January 6, 2015 at 7:28 pm)Heywood Wrote:(January 3, 2015 at 12:02 am)Chas Wrote: biological evolution
Chas is assuming his own conclusion. Chas assumes the biological evolutionary system which resulted in his existence didn't require an intellect....so he concludes it didn't require an intellect. Chas wasn't around and certainly isn't privy to the details of how the evolutionary system which resulted in us came into existence. His assumption/conclusion is worthless.
No, I'm not.
There is no evidence that evolution required an intellect.
There is no evidence that any mechanisms in evolution require an intellect.
There is no evidence that the products of evolution are the products of intellect.
Your conclusions are specious.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.