The most serious issue by far is that criminals couldn't be convicted because their guilt was predetermined by variables they couldn't control - Committing crimes becomes a chain of reactions [naturalistic] that the subject doesn't control. This is why in criminal law we assume free will exists at least as a fiction, otherwise it would compromise the entire system.
We can only consider someone guilty if they are able to choose between breaking or not breaking the law - If someone has their behaviour predetermined then it's not possible to attribute guilt to anyone.
We can only consider someone guilty if they are able to choose between breaking or not breaking the law - If someone has their behaviour predetermined then it's not possible to attribute guilt to anyone.
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you