(January 8, 2015 at 12:57 am)Rhythm Wrote:(January 8, 2015 at 12:13 am)Heywood Wrote: The problem with his thinking is he assumes that evolution came first and intellect second.
-our intellect...is what came second. This isn't an assumption, it's an observation. The only intellects you have ever observed are a product of evolution.
It is an assumption based on one myopic observation. I wouldn't put a lot of confidence in it. The fact that evolutionary systems seem to require intellect makes it even more doubtful.