RE: Deep Seas and Internal Waves
January 9, 2015 at 7:35 pm
(This post was last modified: January 9, 2015 at 7:36 pm by Simon Moon.)
Finding passages in holy books, that can be made to retroactively sound like they made predictions of later scientific discoveries, is nonsense (and non-science, for that matter).
If your book was so miraculous in it's predictions, they would be known before the scientific discovery is made.
Please explain these passages:
Surah 67.5 - Allah made the stars as missiles to throw at devils.
Surah 18.66 - The sun sets in a muddy spring
Surah 24.43 - Hail comes from mountains.
These are just a few of the absurdities in the Q'ran.
Funny how when a Muslim tries to argue the scientific discoveries mentioned in the Quran, these (and many other equally ridiculous passages) get left out.
If your book was so miraculous in it's predictions, they would be known before the scientific discovery is made.
Please explain these passages:
Surah 67.5 - Allah made the stars as missiles to throw at devils.
Surah 18.66 - The sun sets in a muddy spring
Surah 24.43 - Hail comes from mountains.
These are just a few of the absurdities in the Q'ran.
Funny how when a Muslim tries to argue the scientific discoveries mentioned in the Quran, these (and many other equally ridiculous passages) get left out.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
