RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
January 10, 2015 at 1:44 am
(This post was last modified: January 10, 2015 at 1:55 am by Chili.)
(January 9, 2015 at 11:57 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Establish that this is more than simply a story and I'll feign interest.
Incidentally, didn't Ratzinger admit that A&E never existed before he got himself booted out of his gold throne?
Oh sry, I am not really a papist as you might call a Catholic. I do not keep track at all.
But A&E never existed as formed. Man was formed and woman was taken from man, and man was created as male-and-female in the plural as androgyne [and still is created that way] with the potential to become either male or female to say. I.e "male and female, he created them" means plural and androgyne. This is the basis for our sex being an illusion and that makes room for our gender identity too.*
The so called 'fall of man" is what engaged the conscious mind = ego awareness, and that second identity is called Adam. This is made known in the shame complex that was not in Gen. 2:25 where they were naked and felt no shame. Then if you go to Gen. 3 after their eyes were opened, it was Lord God (not God) who asked "the" man: where are you? and then they felt naked etc. and then the crucial question came: "who told you that you were naked" and for this an ego awareness is needed and that is what became known as Adam. Eve, then, is the talking serpent in our conscious mind who later became known as Magdalene (who therefore was left in the dark when Jesus died).
The Jews called her temple tramp as the mediatrix between woman and human that in effect would be between our TOL and our TOK. This so would be the basis for the most welcome 'aha' moments when we relax our thinking mode, but also is the basis for LEM (Law of Excluded Middle, that no self contradiction shall remain).
((Take a good look at this sequence in Gen.3:15 where woman will strike at her head and in turn she (my serpent as Eve) will strike at your heel (my Adam here now))).
Of course the Church knows this (they wrote the thing), but they cannot very well say "it is all in your head" because then nobody would come back and that would be the end of them milking the sheep (to just put it that way). This could very well be the reason why Ratzinger got fired, as you suggest, and I really do not know because I do not follow anything that has to do with theology or Rome.
* You must understand that all our senses are an illusion as a result of the [so called] fall, including the light of common day that are just simple airwaves what our TOL transforms into light because knowledge was prior to it/her/woman that we call Panpsychism today.
In the end our temporal life is also an illusion to make eternal life real as also prior to us, that I already wrote belongs to Rome in what they call Christendom.
Judaism is much the same except that they call it Is-ra-el, to mean state-of-mind (one-with-God) and not a piece of land, simply because (but not only) Eu-phrates means 'bright mind.'
So there is no history in the bible, is the first thing that we must accept. Then note that each and every mythology, including the most primitive ones, has a Genesis of its own. The reason for this is to come full circle and then first know who you are, (and there is lots of poetry on this too).
And sry, you are welcome to read what I write, but I will never ask you to believe anything at will. It is just for you to ponder and then do what you like.
Hint, to learn 'woman' look for Isis and Niaratmya in Buddhism and then you will also know what Panpsyshism is about. Then add that she can be known, (which of course is just opposite to Jesus who does not deliver until after you die).
(January 10, 2015 at 12:27 am)Esquilax Wrote:(January 9, 2015 at 11:57 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Incidentally, didn't Ratzinger admit that A&E never existed before he got himself booted out of his gold throne?
Isn't it interesting, the way that one infallible source can come out and contradict a whole series of infallible sources before him, and yet the church maintains that both sets of claims are infallible?
Be careful as infallibility is a necessary condition to proclaim, but is limited to 'in charge of destiny' just as a Freeman would be. I.e. without that proclamation the claim to have saints in heaven can no longer be made.