Detecting design or intent in nature

[BlackMason]

Dude, it's clear to me that you don't understand the difference between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning. Deductive arguments are 100% certain and therefore valid. Inductive arguments are not. When I make an inductive argument you apply deductive criteria. This tells me you don't know what you're talking about.

Inductive reasoning (as opposed to deductive reasoning) is reasoning in which the premises seek to supply strong evidence for (not absolute proof
of) the truth of the conclusion. While
the conclusion of a deductive argument
is supposed to be certain, the truth of
the conclusion of an inductive
argument is supposed to be probable, based upon the evidence given. [1] The philosophical definition of
inductive reasoning is more nuanced
than simple progression from
particular/individual instances to
broader generalizations. Rather, the
premises of an inductive logical argument indicate some degree of support (inductive probability) for the
conclusion but do not entail it; that is, they suggest truth but do not ensure it.
In this manner, there is the possibility
of moving from general statements to
individual instances (for example,
statistical syllogisms, discussed below).