(August 3, 2010 at 5:09 pm)theVOID Wrote: It seems to me that this changes the issue from a philosophical to a moral one, namely how can you consider his actions perfect considering the amount of suffering of innocence in the world?As God knows everything, he is in a position to make that call fairly. To us it may look the opposite, but we don't share his perspective.
(August 3, 2010 at 5:09 pm)theVOID Wrote: I am also getting the feeling that your God is more mechanical than other concepts, would that be fair to say?I don't know what you mean by that. Oh... you mean he has to act in a certain way - like our actions are mechanical in that we have no choice really in what we do. In that sense, I think yes. God is predictable in that respect, which is how I think his nature is formulated.
(August 3, 2010 at 5:09 pm)theVOID Wrote: What are the practical distinctions that you make between God and natural mechanism?God has the ability to suspend natural law, although to us it would become natural law once enacted, if there were any observable effect. (I hope that's what you meant, or you are going to have to define natural mechanism)
(August 3, 2010 at 5:09 pm)theVOID Wrote:I was trying to work it out, which I did badly, as you rightly pointed out the mistake. A timeless and all knowing being can't learn as that would imply time-bound.fr0d0 Wrote:I agree. He can't have a past.Then what did you mean by him having perspective from and end state?
(August 3, 2010 at 5:09 pm)theVOID Wrote:I agree.(August 3, 2010 at 4:59 pm)tavarish Wrote: Good points fr0d0. Now I'll ask - what separates your claims from being mere assertions?Nothing.