RE: Atheist vs Pantheist
January 15, 2015 at 12:22 am
(This post was last modified: January 15, 2015 at 12:23 am by robvalue.)
I'm well aware of logical fallacies and the scientific method. But I'm afraid I still have no idea what you are talking about. The scientific stance is that supernatural existence or causation cannot be demonstrated, because it cannot be measured. To determine facts about reality, you need something to measure. Just logic, philosophy and posturing is not sufficient. That is my opinion anyhow
If something is not indepently verifiable, to produce consistent results, then it is not of any great value regarding knowledge.
If these other methods were reliable, they would be part of science too. It's like if alternative medicine worked, it would be just called medicine.

If these other methods were reliable, they would be part of science too. It's like if alternative medicine worked, it would be just called medicine.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum