Detecting design or intent in nature

[Heywood]

It's the claim you made, jesus christ Heywood.....I think it's as idiotic as your last claim. You keep gutting your own argument.

Let;s summarize. We began at
"evolutionary systems require intellect"

presented with an evolutionary system (your own, no less) that, by definition, does not, you claim

"we wouldn't be able to observe it without intellect doing x"

Now intellect "doing x" is required for us to -observe- evolutionary systems...but not for evolutionary systems to exist,

Understand?

Your position is the computer generated spider evolved to follow a red dot does not require an intellect to exist. You're wrong. It does. It required a lot of intellects. Including one who designed the "seed" organism from which it evolved in the first place.